Find conflict-free, diverse grant reviewers matched to every proposal, drawn automatically from a research base of 193M papers and 99M author profiles. No manual search, no enterprise-tool friction.
| # | Name | Score | Art. score | Articles | Own works | h-index | Citations | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | E. Novak | CZ | 2.91 | 0.93 | 10 (512) | 310 | 64 | 21 000+ |
| 2 | T. Haugen | NO | 2.74 | 0.90 | 10 (188) | 121 | 31 | 4 100+ |
| 3 | M. Adeyemi | NG | 2.70 | 0.92 | 10 (164) | 96 | 28 | 3 600+ |
| 4 | J. Park | KR | 2.66 | 0.89 | 10 (221) | 143 | 35 | 5 800+ |
Used by 70+ research funders and scientific publishers, including:
Referee Finder
Prophy replaces cumbersome enterprise tools. Find high-quality grant reviewers matched to the proposal in front of you, rather than dug out of a database that fights you. Identification runs automatically over Prophy's research base for every call, so quality holds even under deadline pressure.
| # | Name | Score | Art. score | Articles | Own works | h-index | Citations | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | J. Andersson | GB | 2.80 | 0.90 | 10 (630) | 546 | 79 | 26 000+ |
| 2 | M. Rossi | IT | 2.67 | 0.91 | 10 (243) | 99 | 25 | 2 500+ |
| 3 | L. Zhang | ES · NL | 2.64 | 0.90 | 10 (143) | 83 | 25 | 2 300+ |
| 4 | C. Dubois | FR | 2.63 | 0.90 | 10 (200) | 112 | 20 | 1 400+ |
This is the cluster a funder's board, presidium, and procurement team care most about: evaluations they can defend.
Co-authorship and co-affiliation conflicts surface before the invitation goes out, not after. Accurate conflict detection runs in-house, so you avoid the integrity and reputational risk of third-party outsourcing.
Search by gender, geography, seniority, and additional diversity metrics. You balance the panel from the search itself, and sustain that diversity call after call rather than tracking it on the side.
We'll walk you through the whole process on a real proposal from your portfolio.
Most grant teams arrive from one of three current ways of working. Prophy replaces each of them.
Find high-quality grant reviewers quickly and easily — without the enterprise-tool friction.
Identify and engage emerging authors quickly, instead of tracking talent in spreadsheets that go stale.
Automate and enhance the evaluation of funding outcomes, so research funding reaches the best projects.
Confidentiality
Some funders are building in-house reviewer tools on general-purpose generative AI, feeding confidential proposals into systems that may train on the input. We took a different decision.
Leave a request and we'll get in touch to clarify the details of your call.
We customise the settings to fit your call type — and run Prophy on a real proposal.
Connect Prophy to your grant system via API, so suggestions land in your workflow.
Reviewer candidates and suggested panel members, delivered in seconds.
Head of department of natural sciences and technology, FWF
Prophy helps us and our board members to identify and select reviewers for research proposals. Especially for interdisciplinary research proposals Prophy has shown to be a great asset. The finding process is fast and convenient and comparison between suggested reviewers is a huge advantage.
ETH Zurich, Office of Research
Prophy provides a very good basis to find appropriate peer reviewers for the evaluation of applications to our internal funding instruments and saves us a lot of time.
Prophy can connect to your GMS via API, and we support bulk import and export of your data in a flexible way.
Your data belongs to you, and you can delete it at any time or set up lifecycle rules. We also don't train any models on your data.
Conflict checks run on co-authorship and co-affiliation at reviewer selection; for panel-level checks across every applicant at once, Panel Composer screens the full set together.
Every choice carries a recorded reason and an exportable coverage map — the audit trail stakeholders ask for.
Pricing maps to public-procurement thresholds, with multi-year fixed-price options — we'll walk you through what fits your call volume.
Prophy replaces cumbersome enterprise tools and manual lookups with expert matching on 193M+ papers — quickly, without the enterprise-tool friction.
See how every candidate is matched, explained, and conflict-checked.
How Prophy differs from enterprise reviewer tools, databases, and outsourcing.
Who we serve — funders, publishers, and institutions.
Find the best peer reviewers for any manuscript.